ddmomma
I posted a little more
Posts: 20
|
Post by ddmomma on Apr 30, 2007 21:04:12 GMT -5
Oh my, the poor think looks just like her father.
|
|
|
Post by irelandrugby on Apr 30, 2007 22:22:58 GMT -5
long time lurker, 1st time poster here. WHY would you post such private papers? Horrible and shame on you.
|
|
|
Post by randalgraves on Apr 30, 2007 23:24:06 GMT -5
Ummm... who cares? This really doesn't have a place on a DD forum. Leave the kids out of this. Unless they are in the spotlight doing their own thing (like Roger's son) then I don't see why they should be discussed here.
|
|
|
Post by Tin on Apr 30, 2007 23:34:43 GMT -5
I think the pictures were put up as part of Meredith and Tatjana -- as women in Nick's life. If I'm remembering it right, Nick was at the event too.
|
|
MistressIce
RIO
You're only important in your own mind.....
Posts: 204
|
Post by MistressIce on May 1, 2007 1:21:43 GMT -5
Ummm... who cares? This really doesn't have a place on a DD forum. Leave the kids out of this. Unless they are in the spotlight doing their own thing (like Roger's son) then I don't see why they should be discussed here. Being that it is Nick's daughter then why wouldn't it be on a Duran forum? The pic's aren't really a big deal. Her father is a public figure in some way and there are going to be pics taken of his family when they're out in public. As for the papers regarding the custody/divorce of Nick's family.... That was definitely a horrible thing to post. That is something that is way more private and I"m sure Nick would be disappointed to see it. I'm sure it brings up some nasty memories he might just wish to forget about.
|
|
andijo
Baby Member - Not many posts!
Posts: 3
|
Post by andijo on May 1, 2007 6:48:31 GMT -5
Oh the papers of the divorce. Those seem to resurface every couple of months. Yep, Nick and Julieanne acted a bit immature. And if Nick is embarrassed by that part of his past, he very well should be!
|
|
|
Post by clairestansfield on May 1, 2007 8:27:42 GMT -5
If the mention to the "private papers" is with respect to the alleged international abduction argued under the Hague Convention there has already been a link to the transcripts posted on this board within the past two or three months. I agree that the proceedings were quite personal however legal proceedings are often available for public consumption.
|
|
|
Post by Tin on May 1, 2007 10:07:50 GMT -5
I think I was the last one to post the court papers on the board. I thought they gave a horrific insight into the immaturity of that period. - And I, too, felt badly for Tatjana! They are a matter of public record now; but I regret bringing them up. As others have said, if people want to see them, they'll find them when they Google.
|
|
|
Post by randalgraves on May 1, 2007 10:37:48 GMT -5
Being that it is Nick's daughter then why wouldn't it be on a Duran forum? The pic's aren't really a big deal. Her father is a public figure in some way and there are going to be pics taken of his family when they're out in public. I just don't see what she has to do with Duran Duran. She isn't in the band, she isn't in her own band, she isn't a model or an actress or any other type of public figure. So I don't see why she needs to be discussed here. As for those papers being a matter of public record, they may be but do people REALLY need to know all about that stuff? No, they don't, none of our business.
|
|
|
Post by Tin on May 1, 2007 10:55:38 GMT -5
The fact is, if they feel the need to know . . . and we ALL know there are people out there who do, the information is there instead of prying around in more "private" venues!
|
|