cath
LIBERTY
Posts: 77
|
Post by cath on May 1, 2007 15:09:00 GMT -5
Why upset about someone posting a link where you can find a fairly recent picture of Tatjana? And if Nick is private about his daughter he should not bring her to events where there will be photographers. (On the other hand, Tatjana is no longer a child, she is 21 years old this year.) Someone will take a picture of it (and someone did) and it will most likely be in magazines or on websites (and it was).
|
|
|
Post by caffeinejunkie on May 1, 2007 15:24:35 GMT -5
It the same as people "friending" Georgie Taylor on MySpace. Middle aged women obsessing over teenagers because their fathers are famous. Google the band all you like, google James and A2's band, but leave the other children out of it, irrespective of their ages because their private lives are private.
I've been in the paper and on tv and I'm over 21. Doesn't make me a public commodity for "society" to pour over. It just means I had my picture taken at a function that ended up in the media.
You wouldn't like anyone googling your children, would you?
|
|
|
Post by randalgraves on May 1, 2007 15:31:24 GMT -5
It the same as people "friending" Georgie Taylor on MySpace. Middle aged women obsessing over teenagers because their fathers are famous. Google the band all you like, google James and A2's band, but leave the other children out of it, irrespective of their ages because their private lives are private. I've been in the paper and on tv and I'm over 21. Doesn't make me a public commodity for "society" to pour over. It just means I had my picture taken at a function that ended up in the media. You wouldn't like anyone googling your children, would you? Very good point and that is my issue with it. I also don't see why they should even be a topic of discussion on a DD website. Yeah, they are the children of DD members but so what? The only children of DD members (and former members) I can see discussing are Roger's son, James, that is in Electric City and Andy Taylor's son, Andy because he is in Electric City as well. As far as wives go? Well, Simon's wife is a model.. so I can see that and John's wife is a fashion designer, I can see that. Heck, does Nick's g/f DO anything besides make great eye candy? I really don't know. but the classic cop-out of "well, they are in families of public figures, its to be expected" is bull. They have just as much right to privacy as anyone on this message board.
|
|
|
Post by Tin on May 1, 2007 15:52:52 GMT -5
Meredith styles herself an 'actress'.
|
|
|
Post by caffeinejunkie on May 1, 2007 17:18:50 GMT -5
I'm sorry & I apologize for bringing up the 2nd link about court papers. I edited it out as you can see. The website for listing it on google, should be held accountable. As far as googling for pics, alot of us are curious about the kids and what they look like as the years go by, some of us just aren't willing to admit it. If their parents choose to take them with them to their public events, as well as have pics taken of them in magazines, then there's nothing wrong with it. In your opinion Lots of people take their kids to media covered events. So, the kids pop up in Hello magazine next to their parents, it doesn't make the kids public property, no matter how famous the parents are. I dislike the concept of people's children being googled. You certainly wouldn't like it if it was yours.
|
|
ddmomma
I posted a little more
Posts: 20
|
Post by ddmomma on May 1, 2007 19:24:26 GMT -5
Tatjana isn't a public figure. Her father is. While I would agree if she were a child but since she is an ADULT (21 if I'm not mistaken) she knows what will happen if she goes to a PUBLIC event with her PUBLIC figure father and his girl friend.
|
|
|
Post by Tin on May 1, 2007 22:55:39 GMT -5
Okay, to continue the discussion: Is the photo below an invasion of privacy or a consented to photo? This photo was found by Googling Simon's name, NOT Amber's!
|
|
MistressIce
RIO
You're only important in your own mind.....
Posts: 204
|
Post by MistressIce on May 1, 2007 23:24:53 GMT -5
This photo was found by Googling Simon's name, NOT Amber's! There's a good example right there. Google the names of the guys and you're gonna get pics of them and their family and anyone that by chance has that particular name. Plus pics you may not even wish to look at. Are you now a stalker just cause you by chance got a pic of the kids when you googled their father's name? I don't think so. I'm done with the sheeple in this thread. Y'all need to wisen up.
|
|
|
Post by Tin on May 1, 2007 23:39:33 GMT -5
My point exactly, Mistress. Are we to assume that Simon doesn't want this picture about? If so, why hasn't the photographer, distributor been sued? To me it looks as though they're standing in front of the press pack posing for the picture.
|
|
|
Post by caffeinejunkie on May 2, 2007 4:25:17 GMT -5
And some people are way too obsessed over other people's children!
|
|