|
|
Post by ashes on May 6, 2012 17:33:36 GMT -5
And while most but not all of America continues it's slumber of delirium and denial, RON PAUL is WINNING!
He won most delegates in all these states:
Iowa
Nevada
Minnesota
Alaska
Colarado
Louisiana
Washington
and today
Maine!
War mongers, govt, military, pharma, and the slaves, madman and idiots who love them, time to crawl away and die.
|
|
|
|
Post by sarahb1863 on May 7, 2012 20:19:45 GMT -5
So how many delegates does Paul have now?
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 7, 2012 21:06:17 GMT -5
Haven't counted. But it looks real good.
|
|
|
|
Post by sueb1863 on May 8, 2012 5:34:14 GMT -5
I've seen varying reports, but so far it looks pretty much like this:
Romney - 856
Paul - 94
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 8, 2012 22:52:47 GMT -5
According to the mainstream media maybe, but most sources are simply not even mentioning that he won majority in all those states. They did a story about him winning Maine and mention or two more states. You have to comb through stories to find a mention of the others. Like everything else those figures are falsified. The time for taking these stories seriously is long past.
However there are some refreshing moments like this which even the MSM can't hide. Great for a bellylaugh.
Against Obama, even a jailbird gets some votes
By LAWRENCE MESSINA | Associated Press – 30 mins ago
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — Just how unpopular is President Barack Obama in some parts of the country? Enough that a man in prison in Texas is getting 4 out of 10 votes in West Virginia's Democratic presidential primary.
The inmate, Keith Judd, is serving time at the Beaumont Federal Correctional Institution in Texas for making threats at the University of New Mexico in 1999.
Voters in other states showed their displeasure with Obama in Democratic primaries last March.
In Oklahoma, anti-abortion protestor Randall Terry got 18 percent of the primary vote. A lawyer from Tennessee, John Wolfe, pulled nearly 18,000 votes in the Louisiana primary.
In Alabama, 18 percent of Democratic voters chose "uncommitted" in the primary rather than vote for Obama.
-------
Looks like the messiah is getting crucified!
|
|
|
|
Post by sueb1863 on May 9, 2012 5:39:30 GMT -5
So if the media is wrong about the numbers, what are the real numbers? You must have some idea if you know these are wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 9, 2012 8:36:22 GMT -5
There is no dispute that he did get the majority votes in all those states. How do you suppose his count could be far behind Romney's?
I'll post a vote count when I see an article somewhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by sarahb1863 on May 9, 2012 16:43:24 GMT -5
There is no dispute that he did get the majority votes in all those states. How do you suppose his count could be far behind Romney's? Here is a web link that shows the number of delegates by state: projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 9, 2012 21:50:32 GMT -5
There is no dispute that he did get the majority votes in all those states. How do you suppose his count could be far behind Romney's? Here is a web link that shows the number of delegates by state: projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegatesThat's the wall street journal. It's the same old bullshit. I clicked on Iowa, Maine and Minnesota where Paul has won most votes - according to the mainstream as well - and in all cases wsj shows the same old bs saying Romney won almost all. I just don't even bother. Watching the mainstream media is the exact same thing as reading from white house memo's, pentagon briefs and so on. This is 2012, we ought to know the wolves are at the door but most Americans and others will send their children out the door first then go gambolling out themselves. We all have the ability to access real information and the media will never do it - it's goal is the very opposite. |
|
|
|
Post by sueb1863 on May 10, 2012 5:49:56 GMT -5
So what does the 'real information' say about the true numbers? What's the real total if the media's reports are wrong?
|
|
